<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Generative Ai on Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media</title>
    <link>https://hugo.chnm.gmu.edu/tags/generative-ai/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Generative Ai on Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:29:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://hugo.chnm.gmu.edu/tags/generative-ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Teaching, Writing, and Research with AI</title>
      <link>https://hugo.chnm.gmu.edu/blog/teaching-writing-and-research-with-ai/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://hugo.chnm.gmu.edu/blog/teaching-writing-and-research-with-ai/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When Chat GPT first appeared in November 2022, the almost universal reaction in the humanities community could be summed up in one word – Yikes! Almost without warning this new tool seemed ready to make it incredibly easy for students to “write” essays using prompts that took no more than a minute to produce and then, if they were crafty, another 30 minutes to modify a bit so that it wasn’t quite so obvious that the essay had been written by a large language model (LLM).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
